Info message
Successful operation message
Warning message
Error message

3gok

53 comments · +590 / −154 · rank #2420 of 40,276

I own a house in a small NZ town that my sister lives in. She has had health problems for decades and was in a state house in the city before moving to this affordable town where we found a house for her. This is a second home for me. If this tax law comes in she will have to go back to a state house. When we talked about it she told me she knew three other locals living in second houses owned by their children. They too would all need state housing. Families do more than people realized. This government will need to be very careful of the unintended consequences they may create.

+42−1

Forcing landlords to take dogs? How is this not going to backfire? I would like to see the cost to taxpayers of the increased court hours to deal with the outcome of this plan. As it stands at the moment any carpet over ten years old is considered to have no value by the tribunal. My home has carpet in it that is over twenty years old in excellent condition but Twyford thinks that a landlord should be forced to take in an animal that is probably going to be locked in all day s**ting and pissing up the curtains, recking their insurance and then the landlord would be told that their carpet is worth nothing under the depreciation plan used. Hours of paperwork to file claims and attend court at not compensation to the owner (management fees will have to go up, along with rent). An independent assessor is required to view the property and write a smell verification statement (at cost to the owner) as twenty photos of urine stained carpet is not enough for the tribunal (I speak from experience). In a time with such a housing problem this is the single most unproductive, delusional policy imaginable.

+29−7

I was talking to a city sales agent and she to me many first home buyers want ensuites and internal access garages. I thought she was joking at first. The first home I bought was disgusting, I used a musk and gloves. There is something wrong and the government want first home buyers in new homes. I am sure many off us are rolling our eyes.

+18−1

From the calculation thrown around in early articles we estimate it could be about $9000 per year for this house. I am not scaremongering but home insecurity is real and scary, particularly the elderly. Also my own circumstances has changed reducing my ability to work to the same capacity I use to.

+16−0

How come Paula Bennet never asked to see the science from Housing New Zealand? I understand the concern to show caution but what research did Housing New Zealand use to make this call. This is good news now, but many people have been needlessly homeless for years. Who is responsible for failing to get a proper assessment of the problem? Was it Paula Bennet or the head of Housing New Zealand?

+24−8

This is rather sad because none of the is going to make any meaningful change for the housing shortage. I think this government is so desperate to look like they are doing something. There are too many people and not enough houses. Tenants will pay a letting fee it will be built into the rent, user pays. This country is full of subsided students living away from home when the same course is available in the city they are in. I am not sure why this hasnt been questioned. Why does an 18 year old from Wellington need to leave home to study law in Otago? Then they get free fees. There are many things that dont make sense. Why should a letting agent not be worthy of being paid? Onsite meetings, hours of background checks, preparation of legally binding contracts. This article is quite distorted.

+18−12

I remember visiting my sister in the first home she bought and I asked her why there was a brick in front of her freezer door. She told me her fridge broke and she found this one on the side of the road. The freezer seal needed help from the brick. That brick stayed for another two years. She is 39 and a mortgage free stay at home mum now. Just saying...

+3−0

I am concerned that mum and dad investors will stop building new homes for rental purposes. This is more common than you would think as they are preferred to high maintenance older buildings. This will also contribute to the greater short fall in new healthy homes.

+5−2

It is so shocking that a so called first world country has children sitting in class that are dyslexic without getting any support, not even someone bothered to test them to explain what they are experiencing. Nothing has changed since the 1970s.My son had a horrible experience in primary school, the whole environment was crap. I was toid they couldnt do much for him as he was slow and probably autistic. I removed him at age six and taught him at home until he was sixteen and entered tertiary education. He is finishing university now in a very interesting and difficult field. He is still a little slow. It breaks my heart to think how many children are wasted in this country.

+4−1

You are right. Sadly the tribunals do not agree with you so it is not really, really simple. This creates a problem for good pet owners as well. I would still like to see an estimate from the government of the increased court costs to tax payers to resolve all the problems that will arise as well as an estimate of the rent increase portion for the new management duties involved in disputing the damages that will no doubt increase.

+2−0

Even if the school has a funded learning support department they try and limit access even when provide with the correct paperwork. The ministry has no power over the schools to required support for eligible students. At least not a ministry where David Wales was employed. Under him the department was an impotent waste of taxpayer money.

+2−0

The tenancy agreements already requires them to but the tribunals will not uphold the agreements signed unless proven willful. Then add on depreciation and the landlord is further out of pocket if they get anything at all. I was told that by letting a dog in I was to expect that as normal wear. If the government is going to mandate the use of my private property for unsupervised pets will the also mandate government funded compensation for any damaged caused?

+1−0

I am a landlord and I would never want to see a persons bank statement. This is not my business. A credit check is important and the income, only as I would be out of pocket if they 1ly cant afford it. Snooping though someones bank account is just being controlling and nosy, unless its my teenager.

+2−1

This is not about vaccines, many people who choose to vaccinate dont believe in the abuse of state power. Where does it end? Ive heard 1 in 3 New Zealand kids are obese or overweight. Are these children going to be removed from their parents? Clearly they are not looking after them properly....it is a slippery slope that could end anyway.

+21−21

I manage my own properties but pay a fee to a letting agent and the agent also charged the tenants a fee. I do this because the time involved in find, background checking and generally dealing with some of the crazier stuff you cant imagine is just not worth it.

+0−0

Unfortunately it will also drive investors away from constructing new builds for rental purposes. This happens more often than you would think as a lot on mum and dad investors dont want to deal with run down high maintenance properties. Less houses will be built, more pressure on the housing shortage.

+0−0

If people who are looking for capital gains are unwilling to also rent properties during a peak rental market, the enforcement of tenancy law should be looked at. Two parties can mutually agree on an agreement that is modeled on what Tenancy Services provides and the Tenancy Tribunal can just choose not to enforce it. I see this as a testament to the continues failure to enforce tenancy agreements.

+0−3

They are probably doing it because they are married to a foreign born person and now the government wont give them a pension even though they have always and are still paying their tax like everyone else.

+0−5